Kathy recently authored a post calling for the best hymns for core hymnody. This is not an atypical post here, and neither was the response atypical. Everyone is chiming in with what their personal favorite hymns are, usually with a few Anglican tunes to sound knowledgeable, and demanding that "every parish needs to sing CROOKED BOWTIE!" I find these "core hymnody" discussions therefore quite useless.
However, the concept of a "core hymnody" IS very important; I think there ought to be a small number of hymns which EVERYONE should know, which any congregation will sing confidently and which any visitor will be able to join in. So rather than figure out what those hymns are, I propose that we use this thread to think about what a universal core repertoire should be on an ontological level.
How big should a universal core repertoire be? What determines what hymns are in? What do we NEED in it? Are we speaking prescriptively (These hymns need to be in every hymnal) or descriptively (these are hymns which most everyone knows)?
Only being conscientious of the goals of such a list can we finally embark on creating it.
However, the concept of a "core hymnody" IS very important; I think there ought to be a small number of hymns which EVERYONE should know, which any congregation will sing confidently and which any visitor will be able to join in. So rather than figure out what those hymns are, I propose that we use this thread to think about what a universal core repertoire should be on an ontological level.
How big should a universal core repertoire be? What determines what hymns are in? What do we NEED in it? Are we speaking prescriptively (These hymns need to be in every hymnal) or descriptively (these are hymns which most everyone knows)?
Only being conscientious of the goals of such a list can we finally embark on creating it.